性奴调教

1. Collect data on the number, time-in-rank and demographic characteristics (e.g., age, race, gender, etc.) of faculty that are currently ranked as associate professors at 性奴调教. Among associate professors, are there commonalities among those with time-in-rank for longer than five years?

2. Through interviews, surveys, or other techniques, develop a basis for explaining why some associate professors appear to remain at that rank for extended periods of time, including:

• How many faculty seek promotion but fail to be promoted?
• If associate professors decline to apply for promotion, what are the reasons?
• Are promotion guidelines designed in ways that disadvantage mid-career faculty?
• Is there a lack of incentive for seeking promotion?
• Are expectations for tenure and promotion not aligned with promotion to full professor?
• Do associate professors become unduly burdened with administrative or service work that impedes their ability to complete the work necessary for promotion?
• Are there teaching expectations particular to associate professors that impede their ability to develop their scholarly and professional profile?
• Does the university support research and creative productivity, and grant-seeking, in ways that speak specifically to mid-career faculty concerns?
• Do the university鈥檚 policies on work/life issues (e.g., medical and parental leave; lack of subsidized/onsite childcare; etc.) contribute to difficulties for those seeking promotion to full professor?
• Can information on these issues be disaggregated by race and/or gender?
• Does the new Provost鈥檚 Faculty Workload Policy affect the prospects for mid-career faculty promotion?

3. What does existing literature and/or practices at comparable or aspirational institutions suggest as best practices for supporting and promoting mid-career faculty?

• Toby Benis, College of Arts and Sciences/English, Co-chair
• Kira Banks, College of Arts and Sciences/Psychology
• Julie Birkenmaier, College for Public Health and Social Justice/Social Work
• Craig Boyd, School for Professional Studies
• Charles Croissant, University Libraries
• Robert Cropf, College of Arts and Sciences/Political Science
• Scott Duellman, Richard A. Chaifetz School of Business/Accounting
• Roobik Gharabagi, Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology/ Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
• Sam Jordan, School of Law
• Laura McLaughlin, Trudy Busch Valentine School of Nursing
• Karen Myers, School of Education
• Silvana Siddali, College of Arts and Sciences/History
• Sara Steele, Doisy College of Health Sciences/Communication Science and Disorders
• Constance Wagner, School of Law
• Jinsong Zhang, School of Medicine/Pharmacological and Physiological Science

Ex-Officio Members

• Debie Lohe, Office of the Provost, Co-chair
• Jane McHowat, School of Medicine
• Matthew Christian, Office of the Vice President for Research
• Miriam Joseph, Office of the Provost
• Gina Merys, Reinert Center for Transformative Teaching and Learning

Previous Members

• Mark Ferris, Chaifetz School of Business (Fall 2016-Spring 2018)
• Christine Hachem, School of Medicine (Spring 2017)
• Sam Jordan, School of Law (Fall 2016 - Spring 2017)
• Jean Krampe, Trudy Busch Valentine School of Nursing (Fall 2016-Spring 2018)
• Debra Lohe, Reinert Center for Transformative Teaching and Learning (Fall 2016 - Fall 2017)
• Angela Sharkey, School of Medicine, ex-officio (Spring 2017)
• Anders Walker, School of Law (Fall 2017 - Spring 2018)
• Mary White, Doisy College of Health  Sciences (Fall 2016 - Spring 2017)

During the Spring of 2017, the Mid-Career Faculty Development Committee (MCFDC) oversaw 性奴调教's participation in the Harvard Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) survey as part of the data-collecting phase of the committee's work. COACHE provided 性奴调教 the data in a form that compares our results to other participant universities, but they also gave us the raw data for our responses. This data was provided to our OIR director, who agreed to make it available only in a manner that protects the identity of the respondents (no group will be reported unless it has at least five respondents).

The COACHE survey asked questions in the following categories:

In addition, 性奴调教 participated in the optional survey modules for non-tenure track faculty and for clinical faculty. The non-tenure track faculty module asked questions about contract and promotion processes. The clinical faculty module asked questions about support for patient care and clinical work.

The COACHE survey can break out the results in the following demographic groups (no group for a department, college, etc., will be reported unless it has at least five respondents):

• Provost鈥檚 Email to Faculty Inviting Participation in the Survey  (Spring 2017)
• COACHE Survey 2017 Cohort and Peer Group 
• COACHE Survey 2017 Academic Area Assignments
• COACHE Survey 2017 Topline Results
• Fall 2017 Town Hall Presentation on COACHE Survey Analysis

As requested by the faculty on the MCFDC in initiating this effort, requests for access to the survey data must be approved by the provost and Faculty Senate president.  If you would like to access data from part of the survey,  to provide and submit the required rationale.