ࡱ > _ a ^ b jbjb \ T 0 4 V V V h T > : R R R R 4 0 X , R 9 4 " 4 4 R R 9 4 4 R R " 4 r . If V h O 0 , $ 2 $ 2 ū 2010-2011 Resource Request Form Division / Area Prioritization Due by March 16 Date: 2/28/10 Originator/Source of Request: Dean Johnson Division / Area: Economic Development Department: Automotive Technology Type of Request: FORMCHECKBOX Increase to Ongoing B FORMCHECKBOX One-Time B FORMCHECKBOX Equipment FORMCHECKBOX Facilities Amount Requested: $ ____600________ Resource Description Software Subscription to AutoIndex For the following sections, refer to Program Review. It is not necessary to re-type information from Program Review. Is this request included in the area program review? FORMCHECKBOX YES FORMCHECKBOX No Relation to Strategic Initiatives: FORMCHECKBOX Community of Scholars FORMCHECKBOX Access into Action FORMCHECKBOX Collaborative Decision Making Relation to Core Missions: FORMCHECKBOX Basic Skills FORMCHECKBOX Transfer FORMCHECKBOX Workforce FORMCHECKBOX Stewardship of Resources Purpose of Request: AutoIndex is one of the main software packages that is utilized in Automotive Technology. It is essential that our students gain knowledge and experience in using this software during their courses. The license covers maintenance costs every year. Request Description / Additional Information: We have used this software for the past 5 years and it is highly current with workforce standards. How will the requests effectiveness be measured? What are some milestones that will be used to document progress toward the project goal or to indicate successful utilization of requested resource? (as applicable) Students will be assessed in diagnostic lessons on their effective use of the software, in exams, and in small group activities. Program Review data will be collected yearly to validate the use of the software and its cost. When will the request be implemented / completed? (as applicable) License Renewal every Summer BELOW SECTION TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING PRIORITY RANKING BY DIVISI O N O R A R E A : P r i o r i t y C a t e g o r y : F O R M C H E C K B O X I n c r e a s e t o O n g o i n g B F O R M T E X T F O R M C H E C K B O X O n e - T i m e B F O R M T E X T F O R M C H E C K B O X E q u i p m e n t F O R M T E X T F O R M C H E C K B O X F a c i l i t i e s D i v i s i o n / A r e a P r i o r i t y # : 1 2 3 4 5 o f f i v e F O R M T E X T 1 2 3 4 5 o f f i v e 1 2 3 4 5 o f f i v e 1 2 3 4 5 o f f i v e M a n a g e r / D e a n s S i g n a t u r e ( a c c e p t s r a n k i n g ) : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D a t e : _ _ 2 / 2 8 / 1 0 _ _ _ _ V P S i g n a t u r e ( a c c e p t s ranking): _____________________________________________ Date: __________ Recommended Amount (if determined): ______________________________________ Source of Funds (if determined): _____________________________________________ Project # (if determined): _______________________ FOAP Code (if determined): ______________ <> <>